The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GEOFFREY L. KIDD
____________
Appeal 2007-3583
Application 10/238,147
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: September 26, 2007
____________
Before THOMAS A. WALTZ, JEFFREY T. SMITH, and
LINDA M. GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 20-30 and 32-37, which are the
only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35
U.S.C. § 6(b).
According to Appellant, the invention is directed to a multi-well plate
assembly that defines a plurality of wells, with each well defining an
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013