The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte STEVEN D. GRAY, TIM J. COFFY,
EDWAR S. SHAMSHOUM and HONG CHEN
________________
Appeal 2007-3668
Application 11/031,587
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: September 6, 2007
________________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 2, 3, and 5-10. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6.
Claim 6 and 10 are illustrative:
6. A process for modifying a Ziegler-Natta type catalyst
comprising:
providing a Ziegler-Natta type catalyst; and
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013