Appeal 2007-3669
Application 10/831,671
solely upon this evidence. The Declarant has not indicated that a shadow
mask comprising multiple aperture patterns was unknown prior to this
invention. The Declarant also has not indicated that a person of ordinary
skill in the art would not have recognized that a shadow mask may comprise
multiple shadow mask sections, each including at least one aperture pattern
for annealing underlying regions of a substrate and at least one substrate
alignment aperture.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well stated by
the Examiner, the Examiner’s decision rejecting the appealed claims 23-34
is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(i)(iv).
AFFIRMED
clj
SHARP LABORATORIES OF AMERICA, INC.
C/O LAW OFFICE OF GERALD MALISZEWSKI
P.O. BOX 270829
SAN DIEGO, CA 92198-2829
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013