Ex Parte 4944298 et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                       
                   not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                           
                                              ____________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                 
                                     Ex parte JASON A. SHOLDER                                             
                                              ____________                                                 
                                            Appeal 2007-3787                                               
                                       Reexamination 90/006,6421                                           
                                             Patent 4,944,298                                              
                                         Technology Center 3700                                            
                                              ____________                                                 
                                      Decided:   September 27, 2007                                        
                                              ____________                                                 
               Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, JAMESON LEE, and SALLY C.                                        
               MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                       
               LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                           

           1                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
           2   A. Statement of the Case                                                                    
           3                                                                                               
           4      This is a decision on appeal by an Applicant under 35 U.S.C.  134(a) and                
           5   35 U.S.C.  306 from a rejection of claims 6, 14, 17, 21/6, 22/6, 23/6, 24,                 
           6   25, 26, 27/17, and 28/17 in Reexamination 90/006,642 of Patent 4,944,298.                   
           7   We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.  6(b).2                                               
                                                                                                          
               1      The patent under reexamination is based on Application 07/355,588,                   
               filed May 23, 1989.  The real party in interest is Pacesetter, Inc.                         



Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013