Appeal 2007-3794
Application 10/850,517
evidenced by Terae; and, the rejection of claims 1-10 under § 103(a) as
obvious over Bondoc in view of Gill as evidenced by Terae.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the decision of the Examiner to reject (i) claims 1-4 and
6-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Geary in view of Gill as
evidenced by Terae and (ii) claims 1-10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious
over Bondoc in view of Gill as evidenced by Terae is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
mg Deleted: APJ Initials¶
CAS¶
MT¶
MN¶
Robert D. Touslee
Johns Manville
10100 West Ute Avenue
Littleton CO 80127
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013