Ex Parte Burke et al - Page 3

               Appeal 2007-3918                                                                            
               Application 10/203,926                                                                      

                      (iv) heating the rubber to effect vulcanisation,                                     
               wherein there is formed a foamed rubber having a plurality of microvoids                    
               comprising expanded microspheres incorporated therein, and wherein the                      
               microspheres are expanded during heating and vulcanisation of the rubber,                   
               the vulcanisation process being manipulated such that the volume fraction of                
               the expanded microspheres is 35-80% in the foamed rubber, and the                           
               microspheres have an expanded diameter of between 400 µm and 1000 µm.                       
                      As evidence of unpatentability of the claimed subject matter, the                    
               Examiner has relied upon the following references1:                                         
               Haren    US 4,226,911   Oct. 7, 1980                                                        
               Brennenstuhl  US 5,750,581   May 12, 1998                                                   
               Mitsuboshi   JP 11130916 A    May 18, 1999                                                  
               Noguchi   JP  11189682   Jul. 13, 1999                                                      
               Gehlsen   WO 00/06637   Feb. 10, 2000                                                       
                      The Examiner has rejected the claims on appeal as follows:                           
                      1. Claims 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as                       
               failing to provide an enabling disclosure in the Specification for the                      
               presently claimed subject matter (Answer 3);                                                
                      2. Claims 1 through 3, 6, 8, 11, and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)                     
               as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Gehlsen and Brennenstuhl                   
               (Answer 7);                                                                                 
                      3 Claims 1, 3, 6, 9, 11, 12, and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                      
               unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Mitsuboshi and Brennenstuhl                   
               (Answer 8);                                                                                 
                      4. Claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the                        
               combined disclosures of Mitsuboshi and Noguchi (Answer 8); and                              
                                                                                                          
               1  Our reference to the published Japanese patent applications is to the                    
               corresponding English translations of record.                                               
                                                    3                                                      

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013