Ex Parte Ruka et al - Page 1





                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                          
                                   is not binding precedent of the Board                                     
                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                             _______________                                                 
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                             _______________                                                 
                                      Ex parte ROSWELL J. RUKA,                                              
                           GEORGE R. FOLSER, and SRIKANTH GOPALAN                                            
                                             ______________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-4240                                                
                                          Application 10/663,949                                             
                                          Technology Center 1700                                             
                                             _______________                                                 
                                         Decided: October 31, 2007                                           
                                             _______________                                                 
                Before CHUNG K. PAK, CHARLES F. WARREN, and                                                  
                CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary                        
                Examiner rejecting for at least the second time claims 1 through 18 in the                   
                Office Action mailed August 25, 2006.  35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002);                     
                37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a) (2006).                                                                 
                      We reverse the decision of the Primary Examiner.                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013