|
|
Court OpinionsState LawsAlabama US Code1 USC - General Provisions US Constitution |
Nevada Revised Statutes Section 130.205 - Domestic RelationsLegal Research Home > Nevada Laws > Domestic Relations > Nevada Revised Statutes Section 130.205 - Domestic Relations Continuing, exclusive jurisdiction. 1. A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over a child-support order: (a) As long as this state remains the residence of the obligor, the individual obligee or the child for whose benefit the support order is issued; or (b) Until all of the parties who are natural persons have filed written consents with the tribunal of this state for a tribunal of another state to modify the order and assume continuing and exclusive jurisdiction. 2. A tribunal of this state issuing a child-support order consistent with the law of this state may not exercise its continuing jurisdiction to modify the order if the order has been modified by a tribunal of another state pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act or a law substantially similar to that Act. 3. If a child-support order of this state is modified by a tribunal of another state pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act or a law substantially similar to that Act, a tribunal of this state loses its continuing and exclusive jurisdiction with regard to prospective enforcement of the order issued in this state and may only: (a) Enforce the order that was modified as to amounts accruing before the modification; (b) Enforce aspects of that order that may not be modified; and (c) Provide other appropriate relief for violations of that order which occurred before the effective date of the modification. 4. A tribunal of this state shall recognize the continuing and exclusive jurisdiction of a tribunal of another state that has issued a child-support order pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act or a law substantially similar to that Act. 5. A temporary support order issued ex parte or pending resolution of a jurisdictional conflict does not create continuing and exclusive jurisdiction in the issuing tribunal. 6. A tribunal of this state issuing a support order consistent with the law of this state has continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over a spousal-support order throughout the existence of the support obligation. A tribunal of this state may not modify a spousal-support order issued by a tribunal of another state having continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over that order under the law of that state. Last modified: February 25, 2006 |
|