William D. Colburn - Page 14

                                         14-  -                                        
               In Allen v. United States, 73 AFTR2d 94-1728, 94-1 USTC par.           
          50,102 (N.D. Ga. 1994), the District Court applied the Lewis v.             
          Reynolds, supra, case and found that the Commissioner had the               
          right to reduce the taxpayer's refund by additions to tax after             
          the expiration of the period of limitations for assessment of               
          those additions to tax.  While it is not necessary to reach the             
          issue of a setoff after the expiration of the period of                     
          limitations for assessment under the facts in this case, the                
          rationale of Lewis v. Reynolds, supra, supports respondent's                
          position in this case.                                                      
               Petitioner also contends that since respondent abated the              
          additions to tax, a presumption of correctness should attach to             
          that abatement.  Under section 64044, the Secretary is authorized           
          "to abate the unpaid portion of the assessment".  Respondent's              
          abatement of the assessment of additions to tax was reversed by a           
          subsequent entry to the IRS master file account for petitioner.             
          The abatement was a mere clerical error, which does not carry               


          4  SEC. 6404. ABATEMENTS.                                                   
                    (a) General Rule.--The Secretary is authorized to abate the       
               unpaid portion of the assessment of any tax or any liability in        
               respect thereof, which--                                               
                         (1) is excessive in amount, or                               
                         (2) is assessed after the expiration of the period of        
                    limitations properly applicable thereto, or                       
                         (3) is erroneously or illegally                              
                    assessed.                                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011