Kent Maerki and Kathleen Turner - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          attorney's questions concerning whether he overreported income by           
          this amount, petitioner stated:  "If this was put on the tax                
          return, which I understand it was, we overstated it, yes."  Based           
          on the record before us, petitioners have not met their burden of           
          proof to show that they erroneously reported $5,200 in loan                 
          proceeds as gross receipts.                                                 

          Issue 2.  Schedule C Expenses for the Registry                              

               On the Schedule C for the Registry, petitioners deducted               
          expenses of over $126,000.  Respondent has disallowed $38,271 of            
          those Schedule C deductions.                                                
               Respondent disallowed $8,521, which was deducted as employee           
          benefits on petitioners' Schedule C for the Registry.  Petitioner           
          agreed at trial that he had no substantiation for $2,168 of this            
          amount.4  Of the remaining amount, petitioners claim they are               
          entitled to deduct $4,256 for medical expenses, $1,497 for child            
          care, and $600 for travel reimbursement.                                    
               Medical expenses paid as part of an employee benefit plan              
          can be deducted as a business expense.  Sec. 1.162-10(a), Income            
          Tax Regs.  Of the medical expenses claimed as a business                    

          4On brief, petitioners argue that they actually understated                 
          employee benefits expenses because they failed to take                      
          depreciation on a vehicle they purchased for $28,000.  This                 
          depreciation was allegedly not claimed on their return and,                 
          therefore, was not part of the disallowed deduction.                        
          Petitioners' evidence falls far short of showing that the vehicle           
          was used in their business so as to entitle them to a                       
          depreciation deduction that was not claimed previously.                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011