Maurice H. Sochia and Beatrice M. Sochia - Page 8

                                          8                                           
          Based on well-established law, petitioners' position is frivolous           
          and groundless.                                                             
               We also are convinced that petitioners instituted and                  
          maintained this proceeding primarily, if not exclusively, for               
          purposes of delay.  Having to deal with this matter wasted the              
          Court's time, as well as respondent's.  Moreover, taxpayers with            
          genuine controversies were delayed.  We find all of this                    
          particularly egregious when we consider that petitioners were               
          aware of the outcome of their 1989 case in the Fifth Circuit, on            
          much the same grounds, prior to the time the trial herein                   
          occurred, as we have recounted above.  Cf. Sandvall v.                      
          Commissioner, 898 F.2d 455, 459 (5th Cir. 1990), affg. T.C. Memo.           
          1989-189 and T.C. Memo. 1989-56.                                            
               In view of the foregoing, we will exercise our discretion              
          under section 6673(a)(1) and require petitioners to pay a penalty           
          to the United States in the amount of $2,000 for each of the                
          years here in issue.  Coleman v. Commissioner, supra at 71-72;              
          Crain v. Commissioner, supra at 1417-1418; Coulter v.                       
          Commissioner, 82 T.C. 580, 584-586 (1984); Abrams v.                        
          Commissioner, 82 T.C. 403, 408-411 (1984).                                  
               In order to reflect the foregoing,                                     
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        under Rule 155.                               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  

Last modified: May 25, 2011