Eric Wynn - Page 28

                                        - 28 -                                        
          1983 and 1984, section 6661(a) imposes an addition to tax equal             
          to 10 percent of the underpayment attributable to the                       
          understatement for that year.  An understatement is substantial             
          if it exceeds the greater of 10 percent of the tax required to be           
          shown or $5,000.  Sec. 6661(b)(1)(A).  An "understatement" is               
          defined as the excess of the tax required to be shown on the                
          return over the tax actually shown on the return, but the                   
          understatement is reduced if and to the extent that the taxpayer            
          either had substantial authority for, or adequately disclosed,              
          the tax treatment shown on the return.  Sec. 6661(b)(2).                    
          Respondent's determination of the addition is presumed to be                
          correct, and petitioner bears the burden of proving that he is              
          not liable for the addition.  Rule 142(a).                                  
               If the taxpayer shows that there was reasonable cause for              
          the understatement and that he acted in good faith, the Secretary           
          may waive all or any part of the addition to tax under section              
          6661(a).  Sec. 6661(c).  In this Court, the taxpayer must prove             
          that the Secretary abused his discretion by denying the waiver of           
          the section 6661(a) addition to tax.  Mailman v. Commissioner, 91           
          T.C. 1079, 1083-1084 (1988).  To carry this burden petitioner               
          must show (I) that he requested a waiver under section 6661(c),             
          Klieger v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1992-734, (ii) that                     
          respondent refused the request, id., and (iii) that respondent's            
          refusal to waive the addition to tax was arbitrary, capricious,             






Page:  Previous  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011