John T. Barrett, Jr. and Jane W. A. Barrett - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          to manage Drexel’s assets.  During April 1990, a committee of               
          Drexel’s creditors began an examination of Drexel with a view to            
          establishing bases for possible asset and claim recoveries.                 
               The bankruptcy court set a deadline of November 15, 1990,              
          for filing proofs of claim against Drexel, but allowed the IRS              
          until February 13, 1991, to file its proof of claim on account of           
          all Federal income and other taxes allegedly owed by Drexel and             
          its subsidiaries.  During 1991, a settlement agreement was                  
          reached between Drexel, its subsidiaries, and the IRS with                  
          respect to the IRS' Federal tax claims.  Also during 1991, Drexel           
          reached a settlement with respect to the securities litigation              
          claims made against it.                                                     
               Petitioner filed a timely proof of claim against Drexel’s              
          bankruptcy estate.  Petitioner’s claim was based on, and was                
          equal to, the full face amount of the note.  Petitioner and other           
          former Drexel employees who had received notes in redemption of             
          Drexel shares were represented in the bankruptcy proceeding by a            
          committee known as the Equity Committee.  During 1990, petitioner           
          was informed by the Equity Committee that Drexel might have                 
          committed technical violations of the Employee Retirement Income            
          Security Act (ERISA) with respect to the shares and the note.  A            
          claim pursuant to ERISA was made against Drexel’s bankruptcy                
          estate in connection with the subordinated notes held by                    
          petitioner and approximately 1,000 others, and, after                       
          negotiations, the claims filed by petitioner and other former               




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011