Joe M. and Patricia M. Brown - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          personnel to ensure that delegated tasks are satisfactorily                 
          performed.  Additionally, a project engineer must ensure that               
          appropriate personnel are on duty at all required times and that            
          they carry out their work assignments.  A project engineer is               
          also responsible for recordkeeping and report preparation.                  
               Project engineers spend anywhere from 50 to 70 percent of              
          their time working "on site".  In order to perform their duties             
          on site, the project engineer must be able to move freely about a           
          construction site.  Such mobility demands considerable walking              
          and climbing (e.g., up and down ladders and hillsides, into and             
          out of operating machinery and motor vehicles, on top of building           
          supplies, and over various obstructions).  In addition, "site               
          work" requires the project engineer to lift heavy objects and to            
          "walk beams", particularly when bridge construction is involved.            
               Petitioner was competent as a project engineer, having a               
          good combination of professional skills and practical experience.           
          Moreover, he enjoyed a good reputation as a hard-worker and a               
          "can do" person.  He was also dependable and always available to            
          help others.  Not surprisingly, petitioner was popular among his            
          colleagues; he was equally respected and well-liked by both his             
          superiors and his subordinates.                                             
               Petitioner received superior job evaluations on his annual             
          efficiency rating reports for the calendar years 1989 and 1990.             








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011