Timothy W. and Suzanne M. Coffield - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         

          make a reasonable attempt to comply with the law and disregard of           
          the rules and regulations includes any "careless, reckless, or              
          intentional disregard."  Sec. 6662(c).  While we have sustained             
          respondent's determinations with respect to the savings plan                
          distribution includable in gross income and the additional tax              
          under section 72(t), we do not believe that the understatement of           
          tax was due to negligence.  It appears that petitioner was not              
          given a Form 1099R or any other notice that the withdrawal was              
          taxable prior to filing his return.  As we understand, petitioner           
          thought that the withdrawal of his contribution and the earnings            
          thereon were exempt.  While he was incorrect, we recognize that             
          there may be room for confusion.                                            
          Interest                                                                    
               Petitioner argues that we should abate the interest                    
          determination made by respondent pursuant to section 6404(e)                
          because of respondent's delay in issuing the notice of                      
          deficiency.  The United States Tax Court is a court of limited              
          jurisdiction.  See sec. 7442; Wilt v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 977,            
          978 (1973).  New section 6404(g), added to the Internal Revenue             
          Code by section 302 of the Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2, Pub. L.               
          104-168, authorizes this Court to review the Secretary's failure            
          to abate interest with respect to requests for abatement after              
          July 30, 1996.  Because this case does not involve a request for            
          abatement after July 30, 1996, we lack jurisdiction to abate                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011