G.M. Trading Corporation - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               Respondent's above explanation is consistent with the                  
          following summary of the "basics" of debt-equity-swap                       
          transactions, viewed from the U.S. taxpayer's perspective, as set           
          forth in an attachment to the brief of Chrysler, as amicus                  
          curiae:                                                                     

                    At its simplest, a debt-equity swap (also known as                
               a debt conversion) involves the purchase by a firm,                    
               usually foreign, of sovereign debt at a discount in the                
               secondary market from the bank holding it.  The issuing                
               country then buys back the debt in local currency at                   
               close to its face value.  The firm spends the local                    
               currency received in an approved manner within the                     
               country, usually to finance a fixed equity investment.                 
               Since the prepayment of the obligation is made at a                    
               substantial discount and the local funds are obtained                  
               at a much smaller discount, firms can realize a                        
               significant gain on the spread.  [Business                             
               International Corp., Debt-Equity Swaps: How To Tap an                  
               Emerging Market (1987).  Emphasis added.]                              

               With regard to the value of the Mex$1,736,694,000 that was             
          received, petitioner and the amici curiae argue strenuously that            
          the Court in our prior opinion improperly considered subjective             
          factors to minimize the effect of certain restrictions on the use           
          of the Mexican pesos and that such subjective factors are not               
          properly considered in the hypothetical, willing buyer/willing              
          seller scenario that typically governs a determination of fair              
          market value.  We disagree.                                                 
               The fact that petitioner and Procesos entered into the                 
          transaction for the very purpose of obtaining Mexican pesos to              
          construct and to operate a lambskin processing plant in Mexico is           
          an undisputed fact of this transaction.  There is nothing                   
          subjective about this fact other than that it relates generally             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011