Imelda M. Hansen - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         

          of $12,886.50, a difference of $6,249.58. Of this difference,               
          $622.94 is easily explained.  The record contains copies of the             
          Hansens' returns from 1979 through 1988 as well as transcripts of           
          account for each of those years.  The difference of $622.94 has             
          its genesis in the claimed overpayment from 1979 to 1980, which             
          petitioner contends is $11,497.18, while the transcript of                  
          account shows the credit applied from a prior period to 1980 as             
          $10,874.24.  This discrepancy continues to appear in the                    
          computation of estimated tax carryover for each taxable year                
          through 1988.                                                               
               Section 6214(b) provides:                                              
               The Tax Court in redetermining a deficiency in income                  
               tax for any taxable year * * * shall consider such                     
               facts with relation to the taxes for other years * * *                 
               as may be necessary correctly to redetermine the amount                
               of such deficiency, but in so doing shall have no                      
               jurisdiction to determine whether or not the tax for                   
               any other year * * * has been overpaid or underpaid.                   
               Petitioner's dispute with respondent over the amount of                
          overpayment credit from 1987 to 1988 is a continuation of a                 
          dispute beginning in 1979.  The fact remains that respondent's              
          records reflect an overpayment credit from 1987 to 1988 in the              
          amount of $ 12,886.50, and petitioner has not shown that amount             
          to be any larger.  Accordingly, we reject petitioner's contention           
          in this regard.                                                             
               The balance of the discrepancy stems from various                      
          calculations arising out of the deficiency in the Hansens' income           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011