Southern Boiler Sales & Service, Inc. - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          nearby city of Greensboro as its focus.  However, the limited               
          availability of public water and sewer lines and the                        
          unsuitability of the soil for septic tanks in parts of Pleasant             
          Garden restricted residential development.  The immediate                   
          neighborhood of the property was a well-established residential             
          area, with some new development within a mile of the property.              
          Behind the property, but not part of the property, was a pasture            
          for grazing cows.                                                           
               The property is in an area that was, and as of the time of             
          the trial continued to be, zoned residential-agricultural.  The             
          zoning designation was RA-40, residential-agricultural.  The                
          Guilford County Zoning Ordinance described the RA-40 zoning                 
          district as "a district in which the principal use of the land is           
          for general suburban-residential and agricultural purposes."  One           
          of the stated intents of this zoning was "to prohibit scattered             
          commercial and industrial uses of land".                                    
               Regardless of the zoning, one neighborhood resident operated           
          an accounting business from his home.  Another resident conducted           
          a construction and repair business, using his home for the office           
          functions and performing the construction work at the customers'            
          sites.  A third resident had a commercial dumpster and several              
          vehicles parked at his home.  One of the houses in the                      
          neighborhood was used exclusively as a dental office.                       
          Petitioner's use of the property as an office violated the local            
          zoning ordinance.  Despite the zoning violations by petitioner              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011