Raymond St. Laurent - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal             
          Revenue Code as in effect for the year in issue, and all Rule               
          references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.            
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               At the time the petition in the instant case was filed,                
          petitioner resided in Lewiston, Maine.                                      
               During 1988, petitioner and his ex-wife, Phyllis St.                   
          Laurent, owned, as tenants in common, an apartment complex known            
          as RPDS Estates (RPDS) located in Auburn, Maine.  Petitioner                
          decided to sell RPDS and acquire other real property in which Ms.           
          St. Laurent would not have an interest.  Petitioner intended to             
          dispose of his interest in RPDS by exchanging it for other                  
          property in a manner that would entitle him to nonrecognition               
          treatment of the gain realized pursuant to section 1031(a).                 
               On May 9, 1988, petitioner and Ms. St. Laurent agreed to               
          sell RPDS to Richard and Barbara Labbe for $1,900,000.  The                 
          purchase and sale agreement (sale agreement) signed by them                 
          provided that “It is agreed between the parties that Purchasers             
          shall assist Seller in consummating a Section 1031 Tax Deferred             
          Exchange.  Seller shall indemnify Purchaser of any legal or                 
          accounting costs of said exchange.”                                         
               After the sale agreement was signed, petitioner began                  
          looking for property to replace his interest in RPDS, but he had            
          not selected replacement property by the time the sale of RPDS              
          closed.  The closing was delayed pending regulatory approval of             




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011