Summit Sheet Metal Co. - Page 29

                                       - 29 -                                         

          Regs.  An item is material for purposes of section 446(e) if the            
          time for including it in income or deducting it is at issue.                
          Knight-Ridder Newspapers v. United States, 743 F.2d 781, 798                
          (11th Cir. 1984); Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, supra at            
          510; sec. 1.446-1(e)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs.                            
               Petitioner's officers' bonuses are material items for                  
          purposes of section 446(e) because petitioner seeks to change the           
          year it deducts the bonuses from the year it declared them to the           
          following year.  Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, supra at             
          509-510; H.F. Campbell Co. v. Commissioner, 53 T.C. 439, 447                
          (1969), affd. 443 F.2d 965 (6th Cir. 1971); Fruehauf Trailer Co.            
          v. Commissioner, 42 T.C. 83, 103 (1964), affd. 356 F.2d 975 (6th            
          Cir. 1966); sec. 1.446-1(e)(2)(ii)(a), Income Tax Regs.                     
               3.   Whether Petitioner May Change Its Accounting Method               
                    Without Respondent's Consent Based on a Change in Law             
               Before raising the section 267(a)(2) issue here, petitioner            
          had consistently deducted its officers' bonuses in the year it              
          authorized them.  A change in the consistent treatment of a                 
          material item generally requires the Commissioner's consent under           
          section 446(e).  Witte v. Commissioner, 513 F.2d 391, 393-394               
          (D.C. Cir. 1975), revg. T.C. Memo. 1972-232; H.F. Campbell Co. v.           
          Commissioner, supra; Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Commissioner, supra.           
               Petitioner contends that an accounting change made to comply           
          with section 267(a)(2) does not require respondent's consent.               






Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011