Earnest and Laura Tillman - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          A taxpayer may elect to defer recognition of the gain to the                
          extent that the insurance proceeds do not exceed the cost of                
          qualifying property that is purchased to replace the converted              
          property.  Sec. 1033(a)(2).  A taxpayer's failure to recognize              
          the gain is considered an election under section 1033(a)(2).                
          Sec. 1.1033(a)-2(c)(2), Income Tax Regs.                                    
               Respondent alleges that Mr. Tillman should have recognized a           
          $34,000 gain in 1990 on account of his insurance recovery.  We              
          agree.  In 1990, he received $42,500 from Canal to cover the                
          theft of the 1986 Peterbilt, and he had no basis in the truck for           
          Federal income tax purposes.  Thus, Mr. Tillman realized a                  
          $42,500 gain.  Because $8,500 of this gain is considered                    
          deferred, due to the fact that he purchased the Mack truck in               
          1990, he should have recognized the remaining gain of $34,000 in            
          1990.  He failed to do so.  We hold for respondent on this issue.           
          6.  Addition to Tax Under Sec 6651(a)(1)                                    
               Respondent determined additions to tax under section                   
          6651(a)(1) in each year, asserting that petitioners failed to               
          file timely a Federal income tax return.  We have found that all            
          of petitioners’ tax returns were filed untimely; they were filed            
          outside of the periods of time mentioned in section 6072(a) and             
          6081(a).  In addition, the record does not show that any of the             
          untimely filings was due to reasonable cause and not due to                 
          willful neglect.  Thus, we sustain respondent’s determination               
          that petitioners are subject to additions to tax under section              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011