Amdahl Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          itself out as the owner or purchaser of the employees'                      
          residences.2                                                                
               For regular sales during the years in issue, the average               
          length of time between acceptance of the RSC's offer and passage            
          of title to the third-party purchaser was as follows:                       
                                        Holding Period                                
                         Year                Days                                     
                         1983           102                                           
                         1984           159                                           
                         1985           186                                           
                         1986           147                                           
          For assigned sales during the years in issue, the average length            
          of time between assignment of the third-party contract to the RSC           
          and passage of title to the third-party purchaser was as follows:           
                                        Holding Period                                
                         Year                Days                                     
                         1983           44                                            
                         1984           44                                            
                         1985           44                                            
                         1986                54                                       
               During the years in issue, gross proceeds from sales of                
          residences to third parties in regular and assigned sales were as           
          follows:                                                                    


               2  Respondent offers a single document, a letter written by            
          petitioner's relocation administrator to a mortgage company, to             
          support the contention that petitioner holds itself out as the              
          purchaser of employee residences.  The letter identifies                    
          petitioner as purchasing an employee's home and paying the                  
          employee his equity in the residence.  However, petitioner did              
          not normally write letters of this type and typically referred              
          inquiries by mortgage lenders to the relocation service company             
          (RSC).  We give little weight to the letter as no other evidence            
          indicates that petitioner held itself out to third parties as the           
          owner of the residences.                                                    




Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011