Carol Anderson - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          1992, petitioner also had a second, part-time job promoting                 
          credit cards at shopping malls and college campuses.                        
               Petitioner and her husband, Morris Richard Anderson (Mr.               
          Anderson), were married on October 18, 1990.  Marital                       
          difficulties arose, and Mr. Anderson vacated the marital                    
          residence in 1991 and never returned.  They are not legally                 
          separated or divorced.  Petitioner has a daughter, Morcie                   
          Anderson, who was born in October 1993.                                     
               Petitioner's sister-in-law was a drug addict who was in and            
          out of drug rehabilitation programs during 1992.  From March 1992           
          until December 1992, petitioner's two nieces, Shannon Givens and            
          Timpest Givens, and two nephews, Benjamin Givens and Daniel                 
          Wilcher, stayed at petitioner's home.                                       
               The first issue for decision is whether petitioner is                  
          entitled to dependency exemption deductions for her two nieces              
          and two nephews for 1992.  Petitioner claimed dependency                    
          exemption deductions for Shannon, Timpest, Benjamin, and Daniel             
          on her 1992 return.  Respondent disallowed the claimed deductions           
          in the statutory notice of deficiency.                                      
               Respondent's determinations in the statutory notice of                 
          deficiency are presumed to be correct, and petitioner bears the             
          burden of proving otherwise.  Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering,              
          290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).  In deciding whether this burden is               
          satisfied, the Court is not bound to accept petitioner's self-              
          serving, unverified, and undocumented testimony.  Wood v.                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011