Ronald C. Bachner - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          40 T.C. 597, 654-655 (1963), vacated and remanded pursuant to               
          stipulation (2d Cir. 1965) (holding that the decision in Lewis v.           
          Reynolds, supra, was controlling and allowing a reduction in an             
          overpayment claimed by the taxpayer); Estate of Carruth v.                  
          Commissioner, 28 T.C. 871, 880 (1957).6  Applying the doctrine of           
          Lewis v. Reynolds, supra, to this case, we find that even though            
          assessment and collection of petitioner's tax liability is now              
          barred by the statute of limitations, respondent has the right to           
          retain prior timely payments to the extent they do not exceed the           
          amount of petitioner's actual tax liability.7                               



               6Our holding in Morris v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1966-245,           
          is distinguishable.  In Morris, the taxpayer received and cashed            
          a refund check of $5,752.28 from the Commissioner relating to her           
          1957 tax year.  Later, in 1964, after the period of limitations             
          for assessment had expired, the Commissioner assessed $7,817.98             
          (representing the erroneous refund of $5,752.28 plus interest).             
          In 1965, the Commissioner collected by way of a levy on funds the           
          taxpayer had on deposit at a savings bank.  We held that "The               
          rationale underlying Lewis v. Reynolds is not properly applicable           
          where, as here, the assessment and collection by the Commissioner           
          was illegal."  Here, respondent has neither assessed nor                    
          collected the funds illegally.                                              
               7The statutes authorizing tax refunds and suits for their              
          recovery are predicated upon equitable principles.  Stone v.                
          White, 301 U.S. 532, 535 (1937).  In a Tax Court proceeding,                
          either party is free to raise equity-based defenses to the                  
          assertions of the other party, and the Court, insofar as it has             
          jurisdiction over the main claim, is free to entertain those                
          defenses.  Estate of Mueller v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 551, 557             
          (1993).  Here, we have jurisdiction to determine the overpayment            
          under sec. 6512(b)(1) and, therefore, respondent is free to raise           
          the defense provided in Lewis v. Reynolds, 284 U.S. 281 (1932).             
          See Estate of Mueller v. Commissioner, supra; Woods v.                      
          Commissioner, 92 T.C. 776 (1989).                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011