Charles Crellin Douglass - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          Consequently, the running of the 90-day period prescribed by                
          section 6213(a) for filing a petition in this Court with respect            
          to the 1991 notice was suspended for the period during which the            
          automatic stay was in effect (namely, from December 15, 1994, to            
          May 3, 1996), and for 60 days thereafter.  See sec. 6213(a),                
          (f)(1).  Accordingly, petitioner had a total of 150 days from May           
          3, 1996, or until September 30, 1996, within which to file timely           
          a petition in this Court with respect to the 1991 notice.  See              
          id.  Petitioner filed his petition in this case on December 9,              
          1996.  We conclude that that petition was not timely filed and              
          that this Court has no jurisdiction over petitioner's taxable               
          year 1991.  See secs. 6212 and 6213.                                        
               With respect to petitioner's taxable year 1995, respondent             
          represents in respondent's motion, and petitioner concedes, that            
          respondent did not issue to petitioner a notice of deficiency for           
          that year.  Accordingly, we conclude that this Court has no                 
          jurisdiction over petitioner's taxable year 1995.  See secs. 6212           
          and 6213.                                                                   
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              


                                                  An appropriate Order                
                                             granting respondent's motion,            
                                             as supplemented, and dismiss-            
                                             ing this case for lack of                
                                             jurisdiction will be entered.            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  

Last modified: May 25, 2011