Herbert C. Elliot - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               Petitioner reported on his 1991 and 1992 tax returns that he           
          was entitled to deduct losses under section 1244 of $50,000 and             
          $47,350, respectively, on the theory that the Bank lent him the             
          $500,000, that he contributed the $500,000 to EPC's capital, and            
          that his contribution became worthless in 1988.  Petitioner's               
          1991 and 1992 tax returns included a Form 8275, Disclosure                  
          Statement, and an attachment thereto, that set forth the facts of           
          his theory as well as his position on the deductibility of the              
          amounts under section 1244.  Petitioner's 1991 Form 8275 and                
          attachment thereto also revealed the facts concerning the                   
          $31,000, $12,000, and $5,000 amounts at issue herein and his                
          position on the deductibility of these amounts, which he claimed            
          as business bad debt deductions on the 1991 return.  Petitioner's           
          position on these latter amounts, as stated in his 1991 return,             
          is the same position that petitioner takes in the instant                   
          proceeding.                                                                 
               Petitioner's Federal income tax returns report that he                 
          earned personal service income for every year following and                 
          including the year of the Loan.  In 1991 and 1992, petitioner               
          worked as an employee of Elliott Drywall & Asbestos, Inc., and he           
          was paid compensation of $73,000 and $52,000 during the                     
          respective years.                                                           
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner must prove that respondent's determinations set             
          forth in the notice of deficiency are incorrect.  Rule 142(a);              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011