Ted W. Gleave - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
               its fiscal 1982) and, as to section 6653 (b)(2), in what               
               amount.                                                                
                    (3) What the amount is of Gleave’s and Kenmore’s                  
               unreported income.                                                     
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT3                                   



               3    Rule 151(e) provides that “All briefs shall contain the           
          following in the order indicated”.  Petitioners’ opening and                
          answering briefs (66 pp. and 16 pp., respectively) essentially              
          ignore the first four of the six subparagraphs of the Rules’                
          instructions.  Our ability to understand petitioners’ contentions           
          was handicapped by their failure to obey the Rules’ instructions.           
          In many instances, our ability to ascertain the basis for those             
          of petitioners’ contentions that we do understand, was defeated             
          by petitioners’ failure to obey the instruction in Rule 151(e)(3)           
          that--                                                                      
               In each such numbered statement, [proposed finding of                  
               fact] there shall be inserted references to the pages                  
               of the transcript or the exhibits or other sources                     
               relied upon to support the statement.                                  
          In addition, petitioners have ignored the instruction in Rule               
          151(e)(3) that--                                                            
               In an answering or reply brief, the party shall set                    
               forth any objections, together with the reasons                        
               therefor, to any proposed findings of any other party,                 
               showing the numbers of the statements to which the                     
               objections are directed; in addition, the party may set                
               forth alternative proposed findings of fact.                           
          Under the circumstances, we have assumed that petitioners do not            
          object to respondent’s proposed findings of fact except to the              
          extent that petitioners’ statements on brief are clearly                    
          inconsistent therewith, in which event we have resolved the                 
          inconsistencies based on our understanding of the record as a               
          whole.  See Estate of Jung v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 412, 413               
          n.2 (1993).                                                                 
               Unless indicated otherwise, all Rule references are to the             
          Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011