William L. Reese - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
          at trial or on brief and has failed to propose any findings of              
          fact that would lead to the conclusion that any of the exceptions           
          found in section 6654(e) applies to petitioner.  Petitioner has             
          failed to prove facts to contradict respondent’s determination of           
          an addition to tax in the amount of $1,029.42 under section                 
          6654(a).  Therefore, we sustain respondent's determination of an            
          addition to tax under section 6654(a), subject only to                      
          recalculation of the deficiency.                                            

                                                  Decision will be entered            
                                             under Rule 155.                          




























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  

Last modified: May 25, 2011