Astrida Terauds - Page 23

                                       - 23 -                                         

          entitled thereto.  Petitioner's recourse is to proceed under                
          section 6342.                                                               
          6.  Section 6651(a)(1) Additions to Tax                                     
               The final issue is whether petitioner is liable for the                
          additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for 1986 and 1987.                
               The addition to tax under section 6651(a)(1) is imposed                
          where there is a failure to timely file a tax return, unless it             
          is shown that the failure to timely file is due to reasonable               
          cause and not due to willful neglect.  The taxpayer bears the               
          burden of proving that the Commissioner's determination is in               
          error.  Funk v. Commissioner, 687 F.2d 264, 266 (8th Cir. 1982),            
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1981-506; Ehrlich v. Commissioner, 31 T.C. 536,            
          540 (1958).                                                                 
               Petitioner's returns for 1986 and 1987 were not timely                 
          filed.  Her position is that she could not decide whether she               
          would report the income attributable to the stocks and interest-            
          bearing accounts that were titled jointly in the names of                   
          petitioner and Sandra and, for that reason, did not file her 1986           
          and 1987 returns until 1992.  However, petitioner had salary and            
          wage income in each of these years as to which returns should               
          have been filed.  Whatever doubts petitioner had with respect to            
          income attributable to property that was titled jointly with                
          Sandra was not a reasonable cause for her failure to timely file            
          the 1986 and 1987 returns.  Thus, we hold that her failure to               





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011