Estate of Emerson Winkler, Deceased, Thomas Winkler and Darrell S. Winkler, Co-Executors, et al. - Page 23

                                        - 23 -                                         

             Lotto tickets.  We find that they conducted this activity                 
             on a regular and consistent basis for more than a year                    
             before March 4, 1989.  Thus, based upon all of the facts                  
             and circumstances of this case, we find that the Winklers                 
             in good faith and acting with a business purpose intended                 
             to join together in the present conduct of an enterprise.                 
             See Commissioner v. Culbertson, supra; Luna v. Commis-                    
             sioner, supra.                                                            
                  At trial, respondent emphasized the fact that prior                  
             to the time Mrs. Winkler purchased the winning ticket, the                
             Winklers did not have a specific agreement as to how they                 
             would divide proceeds.  We do not find the absence of such                
             agreement to be fatal to the existence of a partnership                   
             prior to the time Mrs. Winkler purchased the winning                      
             ticket.  As the Supreme Court noted in Culbertson:                        

                  If, upon a consideration of all the facts, it                        
                  is found that the partners joined together in                        
                  good faith to conduct a business, having agreed                      
                  that the services or capital to be contributed                       
                  presently by each is of such value to the                            
                  partnership that the contributor should                              
                  participate in the distribution of profits,                          
                  that is sufficient.  [Commissioner v.                                
                  Culbertson, supra at 744-745.]                                       

                  In the case of a partnership composed of members of                  
             the same family, section 704(e) provides that a person                    
             shall be recognized as a partner if:  (1) The partnership                 





Page:  Previous  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011