Steven and Jennie Jacobs - Page 2

                                                 - 2 -                                                    

            the name of "Jacobs Creative Group".  Those deductions claimed by                             
            petitioners, in the amount of $40,612, exceeded the gross income                              
            of $21,876 reported on Schedule C as the income of Jacobs                                     
            Creative Group, which respondent did not dispute, and reduced the                             
            taxable income from the salary of petitioner Jennie Jacobs                                    
            (Ms. Jacobs) reported on their joint return.                                                  
                  After making some findings of fact of general application,                              
            reciting the procedural history of the case, and providing an                                 
            introductory exposition of applicable law, we shall, for                                      
            convenience, combine our findings, discussion and holding under a                             
            separate heading for each type of expense in issue.                                           
                  Petitioners timely filed an electronic joint return for                                 
            1992.  At the time petitioners filed their petition, they resided                             
            in Reno, Nevada.  Petitioners were divorced in 1996.                                          
                  The case was continued from the Court's May 20, 1996, and                               
            May 4, 1997, Reno, Nevada, general trial sessions on petitioners'                             
            motions on the ground of petitioner's asserted inability to                                   
            prepare for trial by reason of “Chronic Fatigue Immune                                        
            Dysfunction Syndrome (CFIDS)” and a spinal injury.                                            
                  In due course, the case was placed on the Court's May 4,                                
            1998, Reno, Nevada, general trial session.  During the week                                   
            immediately preceding the session, in response to petitioner's                                
            telephone message that he wished to request another continuance,                              
            the Court informed petitioner and respondent that no more                                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011