Lorvic Holdings, Inc. - Page 14

                                                - 14 -                                                  

            literature" to petitioner.  Finally, the parties agreed to the                              
            immediate transfer by wire of $2 million and $1 million for the                             
            covenant not to compete and the secrecy agreement, respectively,                            
            to Scherer at the closing date.                                                             
                  Richard Nemanick simultaneously entered into an exclusive                             
            employment agreement, with LC Acquisition, for a period of 5                                
            years.  He also agreed, during his employment, and for a period                             
            of 3 years thereafter, not to engage in competition with LC                                 
            Acquisition or its affiliates.                                                              
                  After the 1989 transaction, LC Acquisition changed its name                           
            to the Lorvic Corp. (i.e., New Lorvic), the affiliate of Lorvic                             
            Holdings, Inc., petitioner.  The written documentation, however,                            
            that Richard Nemanick frequently submitted to Scherer prior to                              
            the 1989 transaction was not returned to petitioner or its                                  
            affiliates pursuant to the Purchase Agreement.                                              
                  Subsequently, petitioner retained the accounting firm, Ernst                          
            & Young, to complete a valuation of the assets, tangible and                                
            intangible, acquired from Old Lorvic, as well as the noncompete                             
            and secrecy agreements, respectively.  This evaluation was                                  
            undertaken to meet the purchase price allocation rules delineated                           
            in section 1060.                                                                            
                  With respect to the agreements, petitioner claimed the                                
            following amortization expense deductions:                                                  







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011