Stephen D. Podd - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          5/31/88   $89,534   $6,570       1      -      $32,850 -                    
          5/31/89   311,413   -         -         $17,869    89,345-                    
          5/31/90   514,390   -         -         -         -    $102,878             
                                                                                     
               150 percent of the interest due on $148,814.                           
               Respondent determined deficiencies in, additions to tax, and           
          penalties in, Powertex, Inc.'s withholding tax as follows:                  
          Powertex, Inc., docket Nos. 20229-93, 6209-94:                              
          Tax                                                                         
          Year           Additions to Tax Under Section                       Penalties
          Ended   Deficiency6651      6653(a)  6653(a)(1)(A)  6653(a)(1)(B)  6656     6661     Sec. 6662(a)
          5/31/85      -   -        -   -          -      167        -           -    
          5/31/86  $412,425  $103,776.50     -     $20,621.25         1        41,510.60 $103,106.25     -
          5/31/87      -  -      -          -         -           136        -           -
          5/31/88    48,206    12,454$2,410.30      -          -         4,981.60   12,051.50     -
          5/31/89   487,975-    -          -          -        50,106.90     -       $100,213.80
                         -  -          -                                              
          5/31/90   245,882-                   -        24,588        -         49,176  
               150 percent of the interest due on the deficiency.                     
               Pursuant to amended answers, respondent asserts increased              
          deficiencies, additions to tax, and penalties in petitioners'               
          Federal income taxes.2                                                      


          2    The increased deficiencies result from respondent's                    
          assertion of additional constructive dividends to the individual            
          petitioners which, correspondingly, results in increased                    
          additions to tax and penalties.  Specifically, respondent amended           
          his answers to assert that certain payments deducted as                     
          management fees paid by Powertex, Inc. to Powertex Plus                     
          International, Inc. resulted in constructive dividends.  The                
          amendments to answer assert such constructive dividends against             
          several of the individual petitioners in addition to those                  
          against whom constructive dividends were determined in the                  
          notices of deficiency.  The amendments to answer also raise an              
          alternative argument that if these payments are not constructive            
          dividends, they should be characterized as compensation income to           
          the individual petitioners.                                                 
               Respondent also amended his answers with respect to certain            
          royalty payments that respondent determined were not ordinary and           
          necessary business expenses pursuant to sec. 162.  In the notices           
          of deficiency, respondent's alternative position was that the               
          royalty rate should be adjusted, pursuant to sec. 482, to 5                 
          percent.  By way of amended answers, respondent asserts that the            
                                                                (continued...)        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011