Reed Smith Shaw & MClay, William J. Smith, Tax Matters Partner - Page 15

                                       - 15 -                                         
             and all of the plan's assets were distributed into the IRA               
             rollover account.                                                        

             The Partnership's Return Position                                        
                  On its Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income,                
             for 1986, the partnership deducted total contributions to                
             defined benefit plans on behalf of its partners in the                   
             amount of $1,212,474.90.  Of that amount, $20,611 had                    
             allegedly been contributed to Mr. Stein's defined benefit                
             plan, a contribution of $4,111 made to the plan on June 24,              
             1986, and the alleged contribution of 2,000 shares of                    
             Saztec stock, valued at $16,500, described above.                        
                  Respondent issued a timely notice of FPAA to the tax                
             matters partner.  In the notice, respondent adjusted the                 
             deduction claimed by the partnership for contributions to                
             defined benefit pension plans, from $1,212,475 to                        
             $1,195,975.  Thus, respondent disallowed the partnership's               
             deduction of $16,500, the value of the shares of Saztec                  
             stock which the partnership claimed to have contributed to               
             the plan.  The notice describes this adjustment as follows:              

                  The contribution of $16,500 deemed to have been                     
                  made to the Reed Smith Shaw & McClay/Arland T.                      
                  Stein Defined Benefit Pension Plan (No. 125) is                     
                  disallowed because you have failed to establish                     
                  that the contribution [of] 2,000 shares of                          








Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011