Deborah F. Robinson - Page 5

                                        - 5 -                                         
          of which were sent by certified mail,5 to various Internal                  
          Revenue Service offices.  Letters dated June 15, 1991, October 5,           
          1992, October 18, 1992, December 12, 1992, March 14, 1995, July             
          23, 1995, October 4, 1995, and November 15, 1995, list the Summit           
          Avenue address as petitioner's address.  The remaining letters              
          list the P.O. Box 5072 address as petitioner's address.                     
               Of the letters attached to petitioner's motion that list the           
          P.O. Box 5072 address as petitioner's address, the earliest is              
          dated January 11, 1994.  The second earliest is dated November              
          29, 1995.                                                                   
               Shortly after petitioner filed her motion to restrain,                 
          respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction.6             
          Respondent's motion is premised on the ground that, for the                 
          taxable years 1988, 1989, and 1991, the petition was not timely             
          filed within the time prescribed by section 6213(a) or section              
          7502.  For the taxable year 1990, respondent's motion is premised           
          on the ground that respondent is unaware of any notice of                   
          deficiency having been sent to petitioner for that year.7                   


               5  The exhibits to petitioner's motion include copies of 41            
          domestic return receipts (PS Forms 3811) for certified mail sent            
          to various IRS offices.                                                     
               6  Respondent also filed a Notice of Objection to                      
          petitioner's motion on the ground that the Court lacks                      
          jurisdiction in this case.                                                  
               7  The record suggests that respondent accepted petitioner's           
          1990 return as filed and applied the refund claimed thereon to an           
          outstanding liability for some other taxable year.                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011