Charles E. Shepherd - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          an $11,975 credit, and the $11,975 of "other income" on Schedule            
          C, that petitioner claimed for Federal tax paid on fuel.                    
               Petitioner, who has the burden of proof, Welch v. Helvering,           
          290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933), contends that respondent erred in                 
          disallowing the expenses and deductions claimed on his return.              
          In an attempt to substantiate his expenses and deductions,                  
          petitioner submitted a disorganized assortment of receipts.  The            
          vast majority of these receipts relate either to personal                   
          expenses or to cost of goods sold, which respondent allowed in              
          full.  Petitioner did, however, substantiate $255 of charitable             
          contributions and $1,842.58 of expenses relating to the business            
          use of his automobiles.  Petitioner is not entitled to the other            
          expenses and deductions that he claimed.                                    
               Petitioner contends that he is entitled to a credit for fuel           
          excise taxes that he allegedly paid.  Section 34(a) allows a                
          credit for excise tax paid with respect to gasoline used for                
          certain "qualifying purposes" such as farming, off-highway use,             
          and public transportation.  On Form 4136, petitioner claimed a              
          fuel tax credit relating to 99,000 gallons of gasoline that he              
          allegedly purchased.  Petitioner failed, however, to establish a            
          "qualifying purpose".  Accordingly, petitioner is not entitled to           
          the section 34 credit.                                                      
               Petitioner contends that respondent should not have imposed            
          an accuracy-related penalty.  Section 6662 imposes an accuracy-             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011