Robert A. & Gerri M. Smith - Page 12

                                                    - 12 -12                                                      

             be subtracted from purchases and deducted as business expenses.                                      
             With respect to gross receipts, two adjustments are warranted.                                       
             First, the cost of goods sold used in the calculations of gross                                      
             receipts should be adjusted pursuant to the previous sentence.                                       
             Second, instead of applying gross profits of 15 percent (i.e., a                                     
             markup of 18 percent) to guns and 40 percent (i.e., a markup of                                      
             67 percent) to other goods, the cost of guns and other goods                                         
             should be marked up by 15 percent and 40 percent, respectively                                       
             (i.e., cost of guns should be multiplied by 115 percent and cost                                     
             of other goods should be multiplied by 140 percent).                                                 
                    In all other respects that have not been specifically                                         
             addressed, we conclude that respondents' deficiency determination                                    
             is correct.                                                                                          
             III.  The Additions to Tax                                                                           
                    Respondent determined additions to tax pursuant to section                                    
             6651(a)(1) for each of the years in issue.  Section 6651 provides                                    
             an addition to tax for failure to file a tax return in a timely                                      
             manner, unless such failure was due to reasonable cause and not                                      
             due to willful neglect.  Petitioners concede liability for 1990,                                     
             1991, and 1992 and have the burden of proving that their 1993                                        
             return was timely.  See Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. at 115.                                         
             They contend that they filed their 1993 return in a timely manner                                    
             but they failed to present any credible evidence supporting their                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011