Robert K. Stewart, Jr. - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         

          respondent.  See secs. 6213 and 6214; Murphree v. Commissioner,             
          87 T.C. 1309, 1311 (1986); see also sec. 6211 (meaning of the               
          word "deficiency").  When respondent has not determined a                   
          deficiency for a year, we generally may not redetermine if a                
          deficiency or overpayment is present for that year.  See sec.               
          6214(b) ("The Tax Court in redetermining a deficiency * * * shall           
          have no jurisdiction to determine whether or not the tax for any            
          other year or calendar quarter has been overpaid or underpaid");            
          see also Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co., 329 U.S. 296           
          (1946); Commissioner v. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co., 320 U.S.              
          418 (1943); Hays v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-18; Warden v.             
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1990-321, affd. without published                  
          opinion sub nom. Beam v. Commissioner, 956 F.2d 1166 (9th Cir.              
          1992); Stowman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-235; Hutchinson             
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1980-551.                                       
               In the instant case, respondent has determined a deficiency            
          for 1990, and petitioner's 1990 taxable year is the only year               
          that is before the Court.  Thus, even if petitioner did overpay             
          his 1989 tax, a matter on which we express no opinion, we would             
          lack jurisdiction to apply that overpayment against petitioner's            
          deficiency for 1990.                                                        
               We have considered all arguments made by petitioner for a              
          contrary holding, and, to the extent not addressed above, find              
          them to be without merit.  To reflect respondent's concessions,             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011