Tom I. Lincir and Diane C. Lincir - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         

          Mr. Lincir did not know the particulars of such arrangements,               
          however, and he had no knowledge of whether FTI/Merit compensated           
          Mr. Schenkman directly.                                                     
               In 1978, Mr. Lincir invested approximately $225,000 in the             
          FTI/Merit programs.  FTI/Merit provided information concerning              
          the tax ramifications of Mr. Lincir's investments directly to Mr.           
          Schenkman; that information was not provided to Mr. Lincir first.           
          Mr. Schenkman told petitioners that the deductions generated by             
          the FTI/Merit program were in accordance with the tax laws.                 
               The following table is derived from petitioners' Federal               
          income tax returns for the years at issue.  The table compares              
          petitioners' salary income from their businesses with their                 
          "supplemental" losses from FTI/Merit reported on their Schedules            
          4797, Supplemental Schedule of Gains and Losses:                            
               Year           Salary Income       FTI/Merit Losses                    
               1978           $278,600            ($248,013)                          
               1979           278,170             (342,638)                           
               1980           230,000             (430,840)                           
               1981           248,000             (143,469)                           
               1982           302,000             (257,290)                           
               The large losses did not concern Mr. Lincir; he had "total             
          confidence" in Mr. Schenkman and felt that bigger gains would               
          come later, because that was the way the program was described.             
               Mr. Schenkman proposed other investment opportunities to               
          petitioners, but they did not accept any such investment                    
          recommendations.                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011