Norwest Corporation and Subsidiaries, Successor in Interest to Davenport Bank and Trust Company and Subsidiaries - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         

          occurring before January 19, 1992, the effective date of the                
          transaction.  Norwest eventually bought such a policy.                      
               During 1991, DBTC had 9 executives and 73 other officers               
          (collectively, the officers).  John Figge, James Figge, Thomas              
          Figge, and Richard Horst worked on various aspects of the                   
          transaction, as did other officers.  None of the officers were              
          hired specifically to render services on the transaction; all               
          were hired to conduct DBTC's day-to-day banking business.  DBTC’s           
          participation in the transaction had no effect on the salaries              
          paid to its officers.  Of the salaries paid to the officers in              
          1991, $150,000 was attributable to services performed in the                
          transaction.  DBTC deducted the salaries, including the $150,000,           
          on its 1991 Federal income tax return.  Respondent disallowed the           
          $150,000 deduction; i.e., the portion attributable to the                   
          transaction.                                                                
                                       OPINION                                        
               Following petitioner's concession that DBTC must capitalize            
          most of the costs related to the transaction, we are left to                
          decide whether DBTC may deduct the officers' salaries and some of           
          its legal fees.  Respondent argues that INDOPCO, Inc. v.                    
          Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79 (1992), requires that these costs be              
          capitalized because, respondent states, the transaction here,               
          like the transaction there, involved a friendly acquisition from            
          which the parties thereto anticipated significant long-term                 





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011