Richard T. Stanley, Sr. and Miriam Stanley - Page 3




                                         -3-                                          
          are liable for the section 6662(a) accuracy-related penalty for             
          each of the years in issue.1                                                
                                     Background                                       
               The following facts have been stipulated and are so found.             
          The stipulations of fact and the attached exhibits are                      
          incorporated herein by this reference.  Petitioners filed joint             
          tax returns for the years in issue.  Petitioners resided in                 
          Pickens, South Carolina, on the date they filed their petition.             
               Petitioner is the founder of H. E. Stanley Pharmaceuticals             
          and Subsidiaries, hereinafter referred to as the company.  The              
          company was founded to carry on work begun by petitioner's father           
          who was a medical missionary in Haiti.  Its primary focus was the           
          manufacture and sale of preparations containing an ingredient               
          known as QRB-7 for the treatment of certain skin disorders.                 
          Petitioner was the company's majority shareholder at least up to            
          a certain point in 1992.  He was its president, chief executive             
          officer, and motivating force through the end of 1993.  He was              
          the company's largest shareholder up to the time it ceased                  
          operations.                                                                 







          1 Respondent also disallowed deductions of $32,121 for                      
          unreimbursed employee business expenses in 1993 and legal fees of           
          $26,976 in 1994.  Petitioners raised no issue as to these                   
          disallowances in their petition and offered no evidence to                  
          support them.  We treat these disallowances as having been                  
          conceded.                                                                   


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011