Larry W. and Cynthia J/ Van Wyk - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         

          a prohibited interest.3  Moreover, Linda Roorda, as the wife of             
          Keith Roorda, is a "related person to a person with an interest             
          in the activity" within the meaning of section 465(b)(3)(A).4  As           
          we read section 465(b)(3)(B)(ii), it excepts borrowed amounts               
          only where the borrower that is claiming to be at risk on those             
          amounts is a corporation.5  In the instant case, because the                

          3    In Jackson v. Commissioner, 86 T.C. 492, 529 (1986), affd.             
          864 F.2d 1521 (10th Cir. 1989), we held that a prohibited                   
          interest is a capital interest in the activity or an interest in            
          the net profits of the activity.  We have applied the holding in            
          Jackson in later cases.  See Levy v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 838,             
          868 (1988); Larsen v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 1229, 1270 (1987),              
          affd. in part and revd. on another issue sub nom. Casebeer v.               
          Commissioner, 909 F.2d 1360 (9th Cir. 1990); Bennion v.                     
          Commissioner, 88 T.C. 684, 698 (1987).  In these cases, we                  
          defined a capital interest as an interest in the assets of the              
          activity which is distributable to the owner of the capital                 
          interest upon liquidation of the activity.                                  
          4    "Related person" includes a spouse.  See secs. 465(b)(3)(C),           
          267(b)(1) and (c)(4).                                                       
          5    Put more technically, the following analysis was set forth             
          in respondent's brief:                                                      
               "Taxpayer" in * * * paragraph 465(b)(1) is the                         
               antecedent to which "amounts borrowed by a corporation"                
               found in subparagraph 465(b)(3)(B)(ii) refers.  The                    
               clause "amounts borrowed by a corporation" found in                    
               subparagraph 465(b)(3)(B)(ii) relates back to the                      
               phrase "amounts borrowed" found in subparagraph                        
               465(b)(3)(A).  The phrase "amounts borrowed" found in                  
               subparagraph 465(b)(3)(A) relates back to the phrase                   
               "amounts borrowed" found in subparagraph 465(b)(1)(B).                 
               The phrase "amounts borrowed" found in subparagraph                    
               465(b)(1)(B) relates back to the term "taxpayer" found                 
               in both * * * paragraph 465(b)(1) and paragraph                        
               465(b)(2).  This * * * [syntactical] analysis reveals                  
               the clause "by a corporation" to be a term of                          
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011