Clifford E. Barbour, Jr. and Dorothy D. Barbour - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                          
          requested additional time to verify original Forms 1120S, U.S.               
          Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, for Tamperproof and                  
          Identrol for 1990 that had only been filed in September 1997 and             
          with respect to which petitioner was claiming capital loss                   
          carryovers to the year in issue.  Respondent also requested                  
          additional time to verify certain recently provided documentation            
          offered in support of petitioner’s alleged entitlement to an                 
          additional charitable contribution deduction and investment                  
          interest deduction.  Petitioner did not oppose a continuance,                
          respondent’s motion was granted, and the case was continued.                 
          Subsequently, petitioner’s case was calendared for trial at a                
          trial session commencing in October 1998.                                    
               In September 1998, respondent advised the Court, by trial               
          memorandum, that petitioner had raised new issues, claiming                  
          additional deductions with respect to Tamperproof, Identrol, and             
          for a charitable contribution, that petitioner had not pleaded in            
          his petition and which were therefore issues not properly before             
          the Court.                                                                   
               At calendar call, on October 5, 1998, the parties filed with            
          the Court a stipulation of settled issues whereby petitioner                 
          conceded, as determined in the notice of deficiency, that the                
          loss from White Pine claimed in 1992 was a passive activity loss,            
          and that for 1992 petitioner failed to report income in the                  
          amount of $4,958.  Further, the parties stipulated several other             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011