Sharon Purcell DiLeonardo - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          The Litigation, Award of Costs.                                             
               On November 8, 1991, the California Court granted summary              
          adjudication in favor of the Trustee on most of the Objections.             
          On November 12, 1991, the remaining Objections were withdrawn by            
          Burroughs.                                                                  
               After the remaining Objections were withdrawn, the Third               
          Account was approved by the California Court.  The California               
          Court also ordered that the extraordinary distributions provided            
          for in the Third Account be held pending the other beneficiaries’           
          motion for litigation costs.  In December 1991, the other                   
          beneficiaries moved against petitioner for litigation costs.                
               The California Court awarded litigation costs to the other             
          beneficiaries, the Trustee, and the guardian ad litem, stating as           
          follows:                                                                    
                    F.  Based upon all of the evidence presented at                   
               trial, Sharon DiLeonardo’s failure to explain or deny                  
               by her testimony the evidence in the case against her,                 
               the matters of which judicial notice was taken, and the                
               Court’s prior issue-preclusion sanction, the Court                     
               finds:  each and all of Sharon DiLeonardo’s Objections                 
               to the Third Account were frivolous; she knew that her                 
               Objections to the Third Account were frivolous; she                    
               knew that the Third Account was proper; she would have                 
               objected to essentially anything that was included                     
               within the Third Account; that each and all of her                     
               Objections to the Third Account were totally and                       
               completely without merit; that each and all of her                     
               Objections to the Third Account were made in bad faith;                
               that each and all of her Objections to the Third                       
               Account were made for the sole purpose of harassing                    
               opposing parties; that each and all of her Objections                  
               to the Third account were made willfully and                           
               maliciously to injure the trustee or the beneficiaries                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011