Edward D. Lang and Sharon A. Lang - Page 10




                                        - 10 -                                          
          B.   Whether Engineering Income That Trisch Earned From 1989                  
               Through 1993 in the Name of DRD Was Partnership Income                   
               1.      Whether Providing Engineering Services Was a                     
                       Partnership Activity                                             
               Income from personal services earned outside the scope of a              
          partnership is not partnership income.  See Hamm v. Commissioner,             
          683 F.2d 1303, 1304 (10th Cir. 1982) (because the partnership                 
          existed solely to practice law, the income from Mr. Hamm's                    
          services as a judge was not partnership income because those                  
          services were outside the scope of his partnership duties), affg.             
          T.C. Memo. 1980-154; Commissioner v. Smith, 285 F.2d 91, 96-98                
          (5th Cir. 1960) (receipts from whiskey sales that one partner                 
          illegally collected without the knowledge of or benefit to the                
          other partners were not partnership income), affg. Griffin v.                 
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1958-210.                                            
               In Schneer v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 643, 654-656 (1991)                  
          (Court reviewed), we discussed Hamm v. Commissioner, supra, and               
          stated that the language in that opinion about the scope of a                 
          partnership was unnecessary because the partnership had ceased to             
          exist before any of the income in question was earned.  The issue             
          in Schneer was whether a law partner was personally liable for                
          tax on income he had earned before he assigned it to a                        
          partnership.  Although we held that the income at issue in                    
          Schneer was partnership income, it is clear that the issue in                 
          Hamm, Smith, Schneer, and in the instant case is whether a                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011