Ralph J. and Mary H. Muegge - Page 12




                                               - 12 -                                                  
                  To reflect concessions and the foregoing,                                            

                                                            Decision will be entered                   
                                                      under Rule 155.                                  





















                  4(...continued)                                                                      
            Estate of Stern v. IRS, 81 AFTR 2d 98-501, 98-1 USTC par. 60,299,                          
            at 84,372 (S.D. Ind. 1998):                                                                
                  It should be noted that Judge Deiter is a greatly                                    
                  respected and long experienced probate judge.  This                                  
                  court can presume that Judge Deiter was well familiar                                
                  with the reasonable costs of assisted living care in                                 
                  the central Indiana area at the time of the hearing                                  
                  and, thus, he implicitly found the value of Mrs.                                     
                  Muegge’s claim to be appropriate.  This court can also                               
                  presume that Judge Dieter was well aware of the impact                               
                  of allowing such a claim on the taxable value of the                                 
                  estate.  Such issues are involved in probated estates                                
                  on a daily basis.                                                                    
            However, in light of our conclusion, we need not decide                                    
            petitioners’ contention that collateral estoppel or res judicata                           
            applies.                                                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  

Last modified: May 25, 2011