Richard K. and Marilyn J. Phillips - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               1982-12 v. Commissioner, 147 F.3d 221 (2d Cir. 1998),                  
               revg. and remanding Transpac Drilling Venture 1982-16                  
               v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-26; or (3) that                       
               respondent abused his discretion by not issuing a                      
               written notice informing the TMP that his partnership                  
               items would be treated as nonpartnership items.                        
                    Held:  Sec. 301.6231(c)-5T, Temporary Proced. &                   
               Admin. Regs., supra, is a valid regulation.  Held,                     
               further:  The criminal tax investigation did not create                
               a disabling conflict of interest and therefore did not                 
               terminate the TMP’s designation.  Held, further:  Ps                   
               have not established that respondent abused his                        
               discretion by not notifying the TMP that his                           
               partnership items would be treated as nonpartnership                   
               items.                                                                 
               Curtis W. Berner, for petitioners.                                     
               Margaret A. Martin, Neal O. Abreu, Steven Mopsick, and                 
          Ronald L. Buch, Jr., for respondent.                                        
                                       OPINION                                        
               DAWSON, Judge:  This case was assigned to Special Trial                
          Judge Stanley J. Goldberg pursuant to Rules 180, 181, and 183.              
          All Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.  Unless otherwise indicated, section references are to           
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue.  The            
          Court agrees with and adopts the opinion of the Special Trial               
          Judge, which is set forth below.                                            
                         OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE                           
               GOLDBERG, Special Trial Judge:  Respondent determined                  
          deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes, additions to             
          taxes, and penalties for the taxable years and in the amounts set           
          forth below:                                                                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011