J.C. Shepherd - Page 29




                                       - 29 -                                         
          basic rate as being 3.5 percent over the prime lending rate of 9            
          percent and approximately 1.5 times the 30-year bond rate.  His             
          report indicates that this basic discount rate is consistent with           
          the somewhat lower yields on a land lease at a Birmingham                   
          shopping center and with a national survey of 1991 real estate              
          yields for all real estate types.  His report states that a                 
          higher discount is appropriate for the leased land than for these           
          other real estate comparables because the lease income “is                  
          dependent upon the stability or lack thereof in the timber                  
          business.”  His report indicates that an additional 1-percent               
          discount should be added to his 12.5-percent basic rate to                  
          reflect the absence of any lease term requiring the lessee to               
          reseed or reforest the land upon termination of the lease.                  
          Dilmore applied the 13.5-percent discount rate to the pretax                
          lease income stream.                                                        
               Maloy selected a discount rate of 8 percent on the basis of            
          interviews with Federal Land Bank appraisers and forestry                   
          economics professors.  Unlike Lipscomb, but like Dilmore, Maloy             
          applied his selected discount rate to the pretax lease income               
          stream.                                                                     
                           i.  Pretax Versus After-Tax Present Value                  
                           Analysis                                                   
               Respondent argues that Lipscomb’s use of an after-tax                  
          analysis is inappropriate for determining fair market value.                
          Respondent argues that an after-tax analysis is “used only to               





Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011