Sherwin-Williams Company Employee Health Plan Trust - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          Circuit (Court of Appeals), the Court to which an appeal in the             
          instant case would normally lie, did not decide in Phi Delta                
          Theta Fraternity the issues under section 512(a)(3) that are                
          presented here.17   Moreover, the foregoing statement in Phi                
          Delta Theta Fraternity on which the Trustee relies in the instant           
          case is dictum.  Finally, even if the statement in Phi Delta                
          Theta Fraternity were not dictum, we do not find that that                  


               17The taxpayer in Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. Commis-                
          sioner, 887 F.2d 1302 (6th Cir. 1989), affg. 90 T.C. 1033 (1988),           
          was a national college fraternity (fraternity) that was exempt              
          from tax as an organization described in sec. 501(c)(7).  The               
          ultimate issue before the Court of Appeals was whether the                  
          investment income of the fraternity qualified as exempt function            
          income for purposes of sec. 512(a)(3)(A) and (B).  In resolving             
          that issue, the Court considered two questions:  (1) Whether                
          there was a proper set aside by the fraternity within the meaning           
          of sec. 512(a)(3)(B); and (2) even if there was no proper set               
          aside within the meaning of that section, whether the fraternity            
          spent income on exempt purposes, and, if it did, whether that               
          income therefore qualified as exempt function income.  Although             
          those questions are not presented here, it is noteworthy that in            
          resolving those matters the Court of Appeals in Phi Delta Theta             
          Fraternity quoted portions of sec. 512(a)(3)(B) as applicable to            
          the sec. 501(c)(7) fraternity involved in that case, as follows:            
               Such term [exempt function income] also means all                      
               income * * * which is set aside–-                                      
                    (i) for a purpose specified in section 170(c)(4)                  
               * * * including reasonable costs of administration                     
               directly connected with a purpose described in clause                  
               (i) or (ii). * * *                                                     
          Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. Commissioner, supra at 1305.  Thus,           
          the Court of Appeals recognized in Phi Delta Theta Fraternity               
          that the phrase “including reasonable costs of administration               
          directly connected with a purpose described in clause (i) or                
          (ii)” does not stand alone, but pertains to and modifies sec.               
          512(a)(3)(B)(i) as well as sec. 512(a)(3)(B)(ii).                           





Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011