- 7 -
inaccurately identified as retirement[8] salary.
Taxpayer has not filed any application for retirement
allowance. Moreover, these checks serve to validate a
grossly inaccurate retirement fund. Consequently, the
taxpayer does not know how to complete tax filing for
the 1992 tax year and kindly requests a thorough
investigation into this matter. * * *
The substitute Form W-2 was accompanied by a letter
requesting a criminal investigation into the matter. In the
letter, petitioner stated she wished to complete her 1992 Federal
tax return in a manner that would allow her to preserve her legal
rights.
On August 13, 1993, petitioner filed a Form 2688,
“Application for Additional Extension of Time to File U.S.
Individual Income Tax Return”. Petitioner provided the following
explanation for her request:
I requested a criminal investigation of monies reported
on my 1992 W-2. I have not received any information
about the information given on Form 4852 dated June 17,
1993 and [sic] am uncertain about how to file my 1992
tax return.
On October 4, 1993, the Commonwealth Court ordered the
district to pay the sum of $62,275.629 into the Commonwealth
8Neither of the paychecks nor the accompanying payment stubs
identified the payment as retirement salary. The only references
to retirement salary were explanatory notes on the payment stubs
indicating that the payroll deductions taken from petitioner’s
pay for retirement benefits are based on her retirement salary.
9The difference between the $111,708.44 that the
Commonwealth Court ordered the district to pay petitioner on Dec.
3, 1992, and the $62,275.62 that the Commonwealth Court ordered
(continued...)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011